Research knowledge

Collaborative genealogy without losing control of the tree

Use roles, object-level discussions and review steps so relatives and professional researchers can work together without silent overwrites.

Give each collaborator the right role

Owners, editors, contributors and readers need different powers. Invite people to a workspace instead of sharing credentials, apply the least access needed for their task, and review membership when a project or client engagement ends.

Discuss the exact research object

Attach a question or comment to the person, fact, source or citation it concerns. This keeps the conversation beside the evidence, reduces duplicated work and makes it clear which statement a collaborator is challenging or supporting.

Review sensitive changes before they become conclusions

Possible duplicates, uncertain relationships, missing sources and contradictions should remain visible until a qualified collaborator reviews them. Controlled collaboration is not a single global tree where anyone can overwrite everything; it is shared work with explicit authority and an audit trail.